pkgdocs/compare/aiohttp vs uvicorn

Comparing

Python

aiohttp

Async http client/server framework (asyncio)

0/ wk
v3.13.5
vs
Python

uvicorn

Lightning-fast ASGI server for running async Python web apps (FastAPI, Starlette).

7.2M/ wk
v0.30.6
Metricaiohttpuvicorn
EcosystemPythonPython
DifficultyBeginnerBeginner
Weekly downloads07.2M↑
Latest versionv3.13.5v0.30.6
Recipes12↑

Tags

aiohttp only

asynciohttp-clienthttp-serverwebwww/http

Shared

async

uvicorn only

asgiserverfastapiproduction

When to use each

aiohttp

Use aiohttp when you need a battle-tested async HTTP client or server, especially in applications that make many concurrent HTTP calls (scrapers, API aggregators) or build lightweight async web services. It has a mature ecosystem and is widely used in production.

uvicorn

Running any ASGI framework: FastAPI, Starlette, Django Channels, Litestar. Development server with hot reload. Production with Gunicorn+uvicorn workers.

When to skip each

aiohttp

For new async API projects, FastAPI (built on Starlette/uvicorn) has better developer ergonomics, automatic validation, and docs. For synchronous scripts, requests is simpler. httpx offers a compatible API with both sync and async modes if you want flexibility.

uvicorn

WSGI apps (Flask, Django without Channels) — use gunicorn with sync workers instead.

Sample recipes

aiohttp

  • Install aiohttp

uvicorn

  • Run a FastAPI app for development
  • Production deploy with Gunicorn + Uvicorn workers