pkgdocs/compare/celery vs uvicorn

Comparing

Python

celery

Distributed task queue for async and scheduled background jobs in Python.

3.2M/ wk
v5.4.0
vs
Python

uvicorn

Lightning-fast ASGI server for running async Python web apps (FastAPI, Starlette).

7.2M/ wk
v0.30.6
Metricceleryuvicorn
EcosystemPythonPython
DifficultyIntermediateBeginner ✓
Weekly downloads3.2M7.2M↑
Latest versionv5.4.0v0.30.6
Recipes3↑2

Tags

celery only

queuetasksbackgrounddistributed

Shared

async

uvicorn only

asgiserverfastapiproduction

When to use each

celery

Sending emails or notifications, processing uploads, running scheduled cron-style jobs, chaining multi-step workflows, fan-out parallel processing.

uvicorn

Running any ASGI framework: FastAPI, Starlette, Django Channels, Litestar. Development server with hot reload. Production with Gunicorn+uvicorn workers.

When to skip each

celery

Simple scripts that don't serve web traffic — just use asyncio or threading. If you need sub-millisecond latency, Celery's overhead is too high. For tiny projects, consider RQ (simpler) or FastAPI BackgroundTasks.

uvicorn

WSGI apps (Flask, Django without Channels) — use gunicorn with sync workers instead.

Sample recipes

celery

  • Define and run your first background task
  • Schedule a periodic task with Celery Beat
  • Chain tasks into a pipeline

uvicorn

  • Run a FastAPI app for development
  • Production deploy with Gunicorn + Uvicorn workers