pkgdocs/compare/django vs httpx

Comparing

Python

django

A high-level Python web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design

9.9M/ wk
v6.0.3
vs
Python

httpx

The next generation HTTP client

119.1M/ wk
v0.28.1
Metricdjangohttpx
EcosystemPythonPython
DifficultyBeginner ✓Intermediate
Weekly downloads9.9M119.1M↑
Latest versionv6.0.3v0.28.1
Recipes12↑

Tags

django only

web-frameworkormfull-stackbatteries-includedapplication-frameworksdynamic-contentpython-moduleswsgi

Shared

pythonwww/http

httpx only

httpasyncasynciohttp2api-clienttrio

When to use each

django

Use Django for full-stack web applications that need user accounts, an admin interface for content management, forms with validation, or an ORM for complex data relationships. It's the right choice when you want a complete, production-ready framework with a well-trodden path for common features.

httpx

Use httpx when building FastAPI or asyncio applications that call external APIs. Also reach for it when you need HTTP/2 support, a requests-compatible API with async support, or a single library that works in both sync and async contexts.

When to skip each

django

Django is heavy for pure REST APIs — the ORM, templates, and admin panel add weight you don't use. FastAPI is a better starting point for API-only projects. Django's synchronous-by-default nature (though async support has improved) can also be a constraint for highly concurrent applications.

httpx

For simple synchronous scripts where you already use requests, there's little reason to switch — requests has a larger ecosystem of auth libraries and middleware. For high-volume async scraping at scale, aiohttp's lower-level control may be more efficient.

Sample recipes

django

  • Install django

httpx

  • Introduction
  • Installation